All scored servers

nutribalance-mcp: tool descriptions scored

tools/list taken
(UTC)
Scoring rules
v2

Scores, issues and names only

This page shows how nutribalance-mcp's tool descriptions scored, the issues found and the names of its tools and parameters. The descriptions are the server's own: read them where the copy came from.

This copy comes from Smithery's registry, which keeps each tool's name, description and input schema, but no output schema, annotations or instructions. Points for return values and for marking destructive tools can come out lower than the server's own tools/list would give.

A server with a public URL can be scored as it is today: score from a URL

servers/nutribalance-nutribalance-mcp
Average score
54.8 / 100Cloudy
Tools
5
Near-identical descriptions
0

Across the server

No server-wide issues.

Tools

generate_meal_plan

50 / 100Cloudy

Purpose
20 / 20
When to use
10 / 20
Arguments
20 / 25
Return value
0 / 15
Constraints and side effects
0 / 10
Examples
0 / 10
  • Minor
    No `required` list, so every argument is optional.no_required
  • Minor
    Says nothing about what it returns.no_return_info
  • Minor
    No constraints, side effects, auth or rate limits described, and no annotations.no_constraints

lookup_nutrition

52 / 100Cloudy

Purpose
17 / 20
When to use
10 / 20
Arguments
20 / 25
Return value
0 / 15
Constraints and side effects
0 / 10
Examples
5 / 10
  • Minor
    No `required` list, so every argument is optional.no_required
  • Minor
    Says nothing about what it returns.no_return_info
  • Minor
    No constraints, side effects, auth or rate limits described, and no annotations.no_constraints

calculate_tdee

55 / 100Cloudy

Purpose
20 / 20
When to use
15 / 20
Arguments
20 / 25
Return value
0 / 15
Constraints and side effects
0 / 10
Examples
0 / 10
  • Minor
    No `required` list, so every argument is optional.no_required
  • Minor
    Says nothing about what it returns.no_return_info
  • Minor
    No constraints, side effects, auth or rate limits described, and no annotations.no_constraints

fix_deficiency

55 / 100Cloudy

Purpose
20 / 20
When to use
15 / 20
Arguments
20 / 25
Return value
0 / 15
Constraints and side effects
0 / 10
Examples
0 / 10
  • Minor
    No `required` list, so every argument is optional.no_required
  • Minor
    Says nothing about what it returns.no_return_info
  • Minor
    No constraints, side effects, auth or rate limits described, and no annotations.no_constraints

nutrition_score

62 / 100Cloudy

Purpose
20 / 20
When to use
10 / 20
Arguments
20 / 25
Return value
7 / 15
Constraints and side effects
0 / 10
Examples
5 / 10
  • Minor
    No `required` list, so every argument is optional.no_required
  • Minor
    The description mentions none of its 3 or more arguments.params_not_in_description
  • Minor
    No constraints, side effects, auth or rate limits described, and no annotations.no_constraints

What static scoring cannot tell

This score reads only the text of each description and schema: it says what is written, not what a model will do. Short tools whose names already say what they do, such as browser_close, score low here even when models use them well, and in our measurements current models chose the right tool in one step even from one-line descriptions, as long as the names and schemas differed. What the text cannot show, such as what happens over several steps and whether an added sentence helps or misleads, is what an evaluation measures, on the Pro and Team plans.

Is your server listed here and you would rather it were not? Email support@forecall.dev, and we will take it off within 7 days.

All scored servers